Drawings
and Specifications
for
Nucla's In-Plant Coal Handling System Modification
Client Completion Date |
|
Project Description
Tri-State engaged Energy Associates to prepare drawings and specifications for
the turnkey Contractor to design, supply, and installation a new in-plant coal
handling system. This assignment
was a follow-up to previous plant investigations completed by Energy
Associates.
The in-plant coal handling system was part of
EPRI's demonstration program for AFBC technology. The Nucla
Station originally consisted of three 1959 vintage, 36 (3 x 12) MWe, stoker-fired boilers. In 1988, the stokers were replaced by a
new, dual combustor, 110 MWe AFBC boiler.
A new 74 MWe topping steam turbine/generator, with extraction to the
existing turbines, was installed at that time. The in-plant portion of the conveying
system consisted of Stephens-Adamson Redler conveyors
and tertiary crushers. The Redler conveyors featured an en-mass conveying design that
allows these conveyors to elevate coal at a 66 degree incline. The plant was, however, experiencing
wear and other problems with these conveyors. The conveyors were operating 20 hours
per day. The plant considered
conventional belt conveyors to be more reliable. Belt conveyors are used on the
unloading, stacking, and reclaim portions of the coal handling system.
Energy Associates prepared detailed bid drawings and
bid specification for awarding a turnkey Contractor project. The in-plant system is critical to
operating the plant. The 110 MWe AFBC unit cannot be fueled if the in-plant system is
inoperable. As a result,
engineering calculations and drawings were completed to illustrate, in detail,
the design requirements. This
included: conveyor and chute designs (including details of the high-angle
conveyor); framing plans for the building addition complete with member sizes
and connection details; access for stairs, platforms, doors, windows, etc. This approach was used to ensure that
the successful bidder fully understands the requirements for this retrofit
project. The potential for
construction back-charges, which was experienced by Tri-State on other similar
projects which did not use this approach, would be minimized. Most importantly, it helps to define the
scope-of-work so the Contractor can anticipate the requirements for completing
this modification within the scheduled plant outage. Energy Associates assisted Tri-State
with construction reviews and was on-site during the outage period. Illustrated is a portion of the
high-angle conveyor inside a the building extension
that was added above the bunkers for the original three units and adjacent to
the AFBC boiler building.